Now, back to regular programming...
FTC Disclosure: I received a complimentary copy of this book
from Revell Reads. A positive review was not required. These are my honest
thoughts.
I’ve got mixed feelings about this story. It was quite the
intriguing mystery featuring high stakes, politics written well (and I’m tough
to please on that front), and plenty of twists and turns along the storyline.
Positives:
The mysterious scene at the camp near the beginning was
fantastic. It pulled in my interest and set the bar for the suspense vibes for
the remainder of the story. I had hoped this was a sign the camp would play an
integral role in the plot, but I ended up not missing it until about two thirds
of the way in, so that speaks to the pace and twists being strong enough to
keep me invested through the lack of focus on the camp.
Politics are not generally my thing, but I do love a good
political thriller every now and then. The way that aspect of this
story was written seemed organic and well thought out. It wasn't over the
top or oppressive or pushy, which usually irks me. Since those squirrelly vibes
were absent, I was able to enjoy the politics in this book.
High stakes and plot twists really kept the pages turning
for me. They’re hard to talk about without spoiling anything, but one thing for
sure: they kept the story flowing at a white-rapids pace. There was a shocking
twist that popped my mouth wide open, and I truly love it when suspense authors
are able to hit that mark with me. I read the genre so often that a lot of
times I can predict early on some pretty major things. That wasn’t the case
with this particular twist. I truly did not see it coming.
Mystery was a great feature in this book. It started out
with blood in the snow and took off from there, adding layers upon layers the
deeper into the plot we trekked.
Negatives:
The story heavily emphasized the private investigator side
of things and downplayed the Treehouse Gang, so it felt like the book belonged
in the Private Justice series rather than the Code of Honor series.
The reasoning for payment issues didn’t work for me as life
doesn’t offer many breaks for most folks simply because a person “honor[s] a
promise to another” or “run[s] a nonprofit camp for kids.” Reasons given after
this made more sense, but the initial reasons were unrealistic to me.
Something that’s becoming a bit of a trend in Mrs. Hannon’s
books is that the leads’ first reactions are often of a sensual nature rather
than professional. In one example from the story (among many), a “tiny breath
hitch” as two characters shook hands was enough to “stoke [one character’s]
libido.” Seeing that their former careers were Night Stalker (elite military
group) and a police officer, it was to be expected that they would have had a
greater amount of self-discipline than they showed. For me, this was a rather
large inconsistency that was unrealistic.
The opening scene was jarring a creepy in a bad way. It was
a first-person bad-guy point of view, and that was incredibly off-putting to
me. Was I supposed to root for this evil person? If not, I’m not sure why the
first-person perspective was chosen, as that created a very personal
character-reader relationship. Yet, all of the other POVs (and there were SIX
others, which seemed like a lot for a book of this length) were presented in
the third person, which kept the reader at a greater distance than the too-personal
bad-guy POV. I never did get used to this.
Now, I’m not completely tech-savvy, but I’m pretty sure an
e-mail account may be accessed from any computer, smart phone, or any number of
other electronic devices. I’m not sure why none of the three PIs figured this
out. Personally, I have checked the same e-mail account on a phone, laptop,
several desktops, friends’ computers, and hotel computers over the years. I’m
fairly certain a person with the experience these PIs had would have
immediately thought of that.
Perhaps the most disappointing and disconcerting moment was
one in which a character let out a curse phrase that disrespected the Holy
Spirit. The actual curse word was cut short, but the phrase was obvious and
clearly planted in the reader’s mind with no warning. I found it to be in poor
taste for the Christian genre.
Content: one expletive phrase, replacement expletives,
replacement profanity, sexual terms, alcohol, tobacco, marital affairs
2 comments:
What's next month's reading challenge?
Thanks for checking in! I see you found the new (and delayed) post. Happy reading!
Post a Comment